Output can appear logical without the model actually applying formal logic. If its training has associated tools with wood, and sharp edges with splitting, then a prompt containing those ideas can make “use a sharp-edged tool to split wood” a likely continuation even if that exact combination never appeared in training.
By asking follow-up questions and establishing an in-context vocabulary, users can steer output toward a more complete description. For example, “Let’s call that tool and ‘axe’. How might I hold it?”; the model’s learned associations with holding sharp knives carefully can make “by the handle, with the blade facing away from you” a likely response.
I’m confident you could arrive at a near perfect description of an axe this way without any references or depictions of an axe in the training data. I’d imagine the same applies to many cybsecurity/cyber offense concepts (but probably not all).
Some supermarkets in the US (and maybe other places, but can’t speak on those) give department-level managers control over the fridge temps in their department, as well as task them with routine monitoring. From my experience, they do generally have remote assess for both reading current temps and adjusting them, since decisions on where to put certain product (with various temperature requirements) are often made on the fly.
So that's more of an operational role than managerial, at least in corporate terms? I don't have much experience with role requirements in retail, but I imagined it's closer to small-scale manufacturing, where "supervising/controlling the machines" and "managerial duties" would be distinct roles with distinct job titles.
By asking follow-up questions and establishing an in-context vocabulary, users can steer output toward a more complete description. For example, “Let’s call that tool and ‘axe’. How might I hold it?”; the model’s learned associations with holding sharp knives carefully can make “by the handle, with the blade facing away from you” a likely response.
I’m confident you could arrive at a near perfect description of an axe this way without any references or depictions of an axe in the training data. I’d imagine the same applies to many cybsecurity/cyber offense concepts (but probably not all).