HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | HaZeust's commentslogin

What value did second paragraph contribute to discussion?

"and the big office building that's directly connected to it by basement walkways"

I ask in good faith, but why didn't you just say the Treasury Building?


Most people don't know that the Treasury Building is a big office building directly connected to the White House by basement walkways.

I didn’t.

Fair point!

Because it's about Eisenhower Executive Office Building

Why is this omission of any note? I know the building and I can tell you that it is not particularly remarkable.

Because it's not the treasury building lol. There are multiple buildings near the White House that are under this umbrella, and I wouldn't think Treasury is one of them since they need their own office space.

Fable 5.1 is good for better knowledge and tasks that require a more meticulous output, and it's objectively better at design and mockups IMO, but I rarely resort to it outside of that.

I generally use Fable for high-level blueprinting, architecture, and technical planning, and I tell it to write most of its documentation in a way Opus 5.5 will understand and maximally benefit from; with the added prompt for Opus to concede when a task would be better off to bring Fable back in. I've had ZERO problems.


I mean, read the decision. Any evidence that proves whether a contested event or action was "official" or not is inadmissible in court. The Courts cannot investigate the President's motives when deciding whether an action was official or unofficial, and prosecutors cannot use evidence of immune official presidential acts to establish criminal liability, even when prosecuting separate, unofficial conduct.

We simply HAVE to take the Executive's word for whether an action was official or not.


Only when one party does it. See how quickly this will be ruled/interpreted the other way if a Dem admin does it next time.


I admire the optimism; but unfortunately it benefits ANY party in power, so there's little incentive to ignore or overrule. The gauntlet is thrown.


America is cooked SMH


This comment makes apology for grifting, and a good case for bad-faith dialogue - whether to troll, to be unreasonably contrarian, or otherwise.

They gave their money for a Cybertruck, and the liquidity from those reservations was most likely use to posture company assets/P&L, earn interest in a treasury, and whatever other financial weasel techniques that the lawyers and financiers of the world's first trillionaire - Elon - have in mind to use.

Customers didn't get that, and instead had a hold on their money for reasons and means BEYOND receiving the particular commodity that they offered their money for. Forget the pro-regulation and antitrust crowds being discussed in this comment section, you'd be hard-pressed to find even a Laissez-Faire economically-right individual that sleeps well to that notion.


I think they wouldn't have cracked down on it so much if there wasn't in-app purchase crackers (IAPCracker, IAPFree) that directly threatened their revenue bottom-line, and forced developers to deal with in-app piracy.

I think, if a deal was struck with Saurik/Cydia Team and Apple to explicitly not do that, there was a much better chance the jailbreaking community would have held.


I'm not seeing this.

"Up arrow, Up arrow, Down arrow, Down arrow, Left arrow, Right arrow, Left arrow, Right arrow, 'b', 'a'", inside or outside of the input field, does nothing.


It does work, but only on https://america.gov/chat (i.e., after sending a message first), not the front page. Also, note that the Konami Code actually ends with "Start".


Did it on that page the way I said, did it the way I said + "start", did it without the "b" and "a" and just start - still nothing.


You need to send a message first, otherwise https://america.gov/chat just redirects you to the front page.


Confirmation bias of what? Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation's effort as a think-tank is pretty much a baby-stepped blueprint.


That Trump hasn't been following.



This one is a ripped recording:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzHKwhrN1Lg


Because they shared the Newsroom URL, instead of the Apple product page:

https://www.apple.com/iphone-18-pro/


A-h-h! Thanks! But still, I see no usual transitioning; the images differ in style, weird `play` on carousel. Previous ones were eye catchers. Do you disagree?


I like the heavy visual emphasis on the variable aperture across the page! That's pretty cool


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: