HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | FireBeyond's commentslogin

Is there a reason people who have been shown to abuse public positions of trust, authority, or both, should not be prevented from doing so again?

Though I am reminded of the federal register of law enforcement officials who have been terminated for cause, or resigned to avoid termination...

... before that was even more neutered by the Trump administration, the aggregated police unions who represent some 70% of the nation's law enforcement have somehow wangled it into their CBAs that this register was "not to be used for hiring or promotional decisions" (what exactly could it be used for then?).


Kaiser has some very opinionated beliefs that their medical leadership pushes. From my partner's T2D issue (from no history to an ICU stay with DKA): "You cannot go into remission with T2D". "You will need to keep your A1C between 6 and 8 otherwise you will have issues with the medications you are on". They also have many medications they will not prescribe, regardless of the reason.

And don't start me on their pharmacy. She had root canals with some infection, and was in substantial pain. Dentist prescribes short term pain meds between procedures - she's in agony. I drive her from dentist to the Kaiser pharmacy at their UC/ER-lite/whatever facility, that I know from my previous work as a paramedic has pain management medications on site (day surgery, etc.)

"This is a pain management prescription. We do not fill those in person. You will need to submit it to our mail order." "How long will that take?" "5-7 business days, and then shipping time."

"Oh, look at you, coming from the dentist with verifiable surgical procedures done and in pain - just in case you might be drug seeking, you can hang on for a week or two and get your pain management then."

That last one is, I'd argue unethical and against most pharmacists "oaths".


Sure. And I told Claude Code the other week to commit, merge and push some code.

It said "Done, you can open the local dev instance and see the changes".

I could not.

So I asked it. "Well, no, you're not able to see those changes because they're not on that branch or committed."

"But I told you to do that and you said you had."

Claude's verbatim reply?

"You're right. You asked me to do that and I said I would, then told you I had done it, but I had not. Would you like me to do it now, then?"


Ironic that you chose the Apple TV. There's a bit of nuance, and the 3rd gen was $149, not $129 (the latter is Wifi only, when the first two were Wifi+Ethernet).

They then bumped UP the 3rd gen: $249 (+$100) and $199 (+$70).

And the 4th gen has only one option, at $299.

So we've not only "not dropped" prices on the 4K Apple TV, but they've gone up forty per cent.


So what, they still dropped at times. The claim was that they never drop prices.

Right up to the launch of the Apple Silicon Mac Pro in mid 2023, Apple would still happily charge you early 2019 prices for the 2019 Xeon processors in the previous edition, 2019 prices for memory and flash (I ordered mine with 32 and used OWC to go to 192GB, because for the exact same chips, spec, timings, OWC wanted $1,050 for 192GB, and Apple wanted $3,000 for 160GB, i.e. minus the 32GB already rolled into the price. Similar $1K to $3K margin for 8TB of SSD - I bought a PCIe card with 4x2TB Samsung Pro drives).

> along with the eye-watering price point

I mean the entry level price for this is $2,899, "only" $400 more than the comparable non-touch MBP.


Appears to be legal in that current rulings and legislation say that to do so does not run afoul of fair use.

Let's ignore every other aspect of this case.

Criminal law, "beyond a reasonable doubt", doesn't mean "there exists, however implausible, an explanation".

He did break into the network - he was spoofing MAC addresses. You don't have a level of technical sophistication allowing you to do this, and then say "oh, I assumed the server closet with an "Authorized access only" sign, usually locked, seemed like a safe place, that's all, and since I was there, I figured I might as well just plug directly into a network switch in there."

Many judges are not technical. Most judges are not idiots.


It downgrades the charge from felony computer network intrusion to misdemeanor trespassing.

How so?

Spoofing a MAC address because IT security has specifically sought to block you from network access (whether you think they "should" or not) just magically handwaved away because "he was really just looking for somewhere to keep his computer secure" (while it circumvented network access controls).

It did no such thing.


As the Dilbert cartoon says, when he's arguing with Dogbert about having a personality:

"Let's not start this whole 'zero is too a number' argument again"


Yup. Had an MacBook Air. Slight water damage near charging port. Laptop functioned correctly on AC power. Extensive battery diagnostics: Healthy. Just the charging circuit saying "go ahead, charge device"...

At the Genius Bar expected something reasonable, realistic... $300? Parts and labor.

"So we have a quote for you, $950. Perhaps we go out and look at the new Macs together?"

90% of the cost of the laptop to replace the charging port.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: