I'd rather vaguely gesture at data in the training corpus. That, at least, introduces some variance and forces me to add my spin on things after testing.

I sometimes get jumpscaped at the thought of older or less proven models used in enterprise settings. I understand the devex ergonomics argument; I'm not a fan of profiles concepts typically if trodding into delegation.

I wish DHH even had pretended a solidified use of the funds.

Beyond my moral objections and public security concerns, I saw more forethought from ClearLinux by Intel around the same maturity point.

Hype doesn't make an OS appealing to me.

I wondered recently about why we stopped with the semantic split of thinking/actions vs user facing communication because the all powerful tool calling craze. Code comments that talk about the prompt is an obvious byproduct of the mixed context. Chain of thought and ReAct were great, but feel like a first pass moreso than the final landing spot.

https://n.zip/2e85 I had sorta started a SFT to explore this idea. it would prove results even with smaller models that fit on a DGX spark. Just takes some more thinking rather than my ADHD mind.