Also not a fan of country/folk, but today I learned about her special albums trilogy: The Grass Is Blue, Little Sparrow, and Halos & Horns. Quite different music!
If you want to say that "admin can" - it doesn't matter, I'm not going to ping admin every day to check how it goes. I'm not going to ask admin about every session to check how cost efficient a model was.
“Physically accurate” indeed raises the bar significantly.
You’ve already done great work here. That said, the feedback seems to come from someone who spent considerable time analyzing your work. Even if only a few of the suggestions are ultimately valuable, that’s still a meaningful contribution and worth considering.
Sure, most of the raised questions are reasonable potential feature additions to be made – things like rotating black holes, or linear brightness-to-screen-pixel mapping. They just aren't "inaccuracies", in my opinion.
No, it should follow my rules exactly. I don't care what code examples it was trained on - it will either write code the way I want, or I'll use another model.
Yeah anthropic essentially saying "just trust the agent bro" is the exact opposite a sane engineer with respect for their own craft should be doing.
Then add on the fact that their guardrails now block blue teams, purple teams, red teams and some people in biology and medicine from even getting answers.
I'm doing a pentesting course to learn application security in-depth, so I can secure my stack better.
Claude won't answer my questions anymore, so my sub has been canceled.
Or other models.
I'd much rather have open standards to follow instead of relying on vendor lock in and features automatically enforced by one company, which are not supported by others.
A good example is the agent skills open standard which was invented by anthropic but given to the public and is followed by other vendors as well
