Making red lines explicit while calm seems useful. Is it stored locally?

Hi, it's stored locally. If you share it on the wall, it gets stored with a random ID in a database, and you can put your name to them or share them anonymously, it'd be interesting to hear what you think. Any feedback would be really useful.

Thanks, local first makes sense for this. I will check the wall too.

This is great, I also grew up on Black Ops 2. How big is the recompiled binary compared to original?

Thanks a lot! The original exe is around 13 MB per mode, mine is more between 500 and 800 MB each. Basically every x86 instruction becomes a bunch of ARM64 ones, and there is also a lot of extra code for the CPU state. Still runs at 60fps tho, so as long as you have decent storage it's not that much of a problem :)

I didn't know this and kept sharing links on my new page and it was banned from posting.I tried to look for support but just received responses from bots all the time and no human review until I gave up. I ended up starting another page.

Does this mean we should not always entrust our domains with only one registrar?

What do you mean, can you entrust one domain with multiple registrars?

I meant for people with multiple domains.

Splitting them round robin, or even in half, sounds horrible.

But maybe if you have 1 (one) backup domain like mydomain.net then you can host that on another vendor. But I'd rather just fail and focus on restoring at that point, you are still losing all traffic to the main domain, and contacting users with a secondary domain they've never heard off is a security posture nightmare and unprofessional.

I am also building an app that converts web pages to Markdown. How do you handle messy scans and tables?

In Uganda carrying two phones is completely normal. Many people have one for work and one for personal use, or simply because they can afford a second phone. Police wouldn't think twice about it.

40 minutes, and not a single ‘I’m moving to Uganda’ message.

Why don't you go first?

Waiting for you

This is good, I didn't know 3DS could handle PS2 emulation.

What's the performance like on heavier titles?

How are you handling local transcription? We opted for an offline-first for FetchMark archiver for same privacy reason and it doubled our retention.

Congrats on shipping!

I didn't realize macOS was actually certified UNIX since 2007, thought it was just marketing.

Is this Apple just not wanting to pay for the certification anymore or does it actually change anything for us devs?

There's a long story behind it, but Apple started saying that Mac OS X was UNIX, but UNIX was a trademark. So Apple decided that they either needed to alter OS X to conform to UNIX standards or buy the trademark. They chose the former.

> Is this Apple just not wanting to pay for the certification anymore or does it actually change anything for us devs?

It's probably not about paying and more about tiny differences. Will it change anything for you? Almost certainly not. In fact, it might make things better for you. If anything, Apple's adherence to the UNIX spec can sometimes mean subtle differences in tools between macOS and BSD/Linux. Do you want things like grep or sed that conform to the UNIX spec or that work like grep and sed work in the real world?

And these differences are often small edge cases that don't come up much, but a spec is a spec.

The money is inconsequential for Apple, but at this point it probably makes more sense to just stop calling it UNIX and not worry about shipping a version of a tool exactly meets the UNIX spec - it'd be more useful for their users if it matched the behavior on Linux/BSD.

Thanks for explaining.

That grep/sed difference on mac caused me issues so many times, always thought it was just Apple doing their own thing. I didn't realize it was a spec thing.

It's neither, really. OS X takes its command line utilities from BSD world, while Linux's mostly come from GNU. They're independent implementations, and GNU utilities are as a rule much more featureful than their BSD equivalents. Or much more bloated, depending on your point of view.

Both aim to conform to the POSIX, but POSIX is a very spartan spec, people routinely use non-POSIX features without realizing it.

Tahoe and Sequoia are still in the apple's apple's list(https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/apple.htm)

Tahoe, Sequoia, Ventura, and Monterey were in main list until October 7.

Can't figure out the reason.

This is not surprising. Every big lab blocks competitor tools for internal use; it is a data governance thing, not a quality statement.

Right! it seems obvious why: Both these companies want to dogfood their own coding models and stop paying competition.

You can also read this as diminishing returns / AI isn't good enough, etc, but the simplest explanation is that they don't want to send money to Anthropic.

This, and in addition to dogfooding, incentivizing employees to be more effective with the cheaper models. A lot of problems don't need anything fancy, but it takes more brain power and engineering effort to make that work. By default humans will take the path of least resistance if it's available.

This is likely the future as well. Down the road, every company will have their own internal coding models.

Does MS have coding models?

yes, but there's a reason nobody talks about them

But Microsoft and Meta are not blocking competitor tools for internal use, they're merely trying to reduce costs and divert a fraction of use to their own technologies. Microsoft and Meta are both still spending nine figures a year on Claude, and the article does not state or imply they're even considering a complete halt.

Microsoft has full and unlimited access to OpenAI models. That was some agreement when they invested originally.

So nobody except AI labs is allowed to do "data governance"?