HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | Alien1Being's commentslogin

Give it a year and Microsoft will have abandoned it for some other shiny buzzword rich agentic slop ...


Truly rich people do not have TVs.

Or if they do own a ultra high end TV like a C Seed N1 they hide them away inconspicuously.

https://www.cseed.com/en/indoor-tv/c-seed-n1-tv.html

It is like eating cheap and nasty junk. If you are rich you avoid it or eat it discreetly...Or your acquaintances laugh at you.


If you want slightly more affordable (they have prices listed - starting at £6k for a 48" TV) there's also Bang & Olufsen:

https://www.bang-olufsen.com/en/gb/televisions


That's certainly a feature screen. Not sure it's inconspicuous!

I think I'd likely prefer one of those slightly more discrete OLEDs that rolls up into its box when not in use, like the LG Signature R...


Looks like everyone is hoping that Chinese AI wins over AI from Trump's land.


AI slop site with AI slop research...

Blog populated with incoherent PR material generated by Yet Another AI.

Sigh...


Can Dang implement a slop rating on submitted pages? Not a block but at least a % likelihood of AI slop content and that could also be tied with a BS rating as well.

Could use AI for both which seems hilariously appropriate.


Or perhaps a slop flag on submissions that gets added once enough readers have flagged it as such. I'd love that feature.


Never piss off the minions of the Supreme Leader.


I remember using pure metal tapes...


China operates a massive green hydrogen and ammonia facility in Chifeng, which is powered entirely by off-grid wind and solar. The site already produces 320,000 tonnes of green ammonia annually.

This is going to be the century of China...

In contrast, this Minnesotan plant aims to scale up to 300 tonnes a year some day.


Meanwhile America is having its glorious McCarthy moment....


Debian should completely avoid AI slop.

Let the Salesforces and the Atlassians of the world destroy themselves with poor quality vibecode driven teams.

Using LLM to scan for security holes is another issue altogether.


Indeed it is, and it doesn't count as a "contribution" at all; the actual work is in fixing the CVE.


This is nonsense, the vast majority of critical CVEs are trivial to fix once you spot them. It's very rare that you have something like spectre where the solution is non-obvious: most of them are shit like "delete a `free`" or "put the `goto fail` in braces".


It’s still not an LLM contribution in a meaningful sense. The contribution is the fix, no matter how trivial it is.


He was related to the Dvorak keyboard inventor.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: