Why do they need it more than OpenAI?

I don't think it's because they need it more, but rather that their revenue picture looks relatively better than OpenAI's right now.

I doubt OpenAI will wait very long - it seems both companies are timing this based on trying to finesse the timing for when they look best, not based on need.

> Sure, if you're the kind of guy who sleeps with your subordinates and Chinese spies.

So future founders who plan to take companies public

> The amount of newsroom jobs fell 60% between 2008 and 2020. [0]

My reaction was a little different. I said "that's it? Only 60%?"

At what point will this exemption become an unreasonable request?

Some exemptions businesses are required to accommodate, like putting in a ramp to an office so someone can get to a desk. Others are considered unreasonable, making it possible for someone who uses a wheelchair to work on high-tension wires.

I yearn for the day when Anthropic moves on to dealing with big problems and leaves the mundane to cheaper models that focus on volume over quality, because it's no longer worth their time.

It'll mean the AI we all need in daily life is nowhere near the frontier anymore.

The silent majority doesn’t live on Hacker News

Tumblr too?

What actually is Scribd?

They were always just that thing that showed up in Google searches cause they scraped presentations and stuff that was unknowingly public. But I didn’t quite know why anyone found them of value.

It's a pdf archive; their idea is to scrape pdf that are public, then charge you to download when they are no longer public.

Interesting enfough, wave years tend not to produce much of this post-election bump. And often a small near term dip followed by a muted year

But let’s consider what causes a wave. Economic anger.

Th difference now is Trump will be on his way out