HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | 999900000999's commentslogin

Makes sense, the legal system is pay to play.

Bluesky is here anyway.

Hell, you’re arguably on a Twitter alternative right now.


I have absolutely no faith in Microsoft to make anything decent with its legacy IPs.

Ohh well


Meanwhile, Nintendo with a tiny fraction of MS market cap is absolutely killing it with their legacy IP.


For all the flaws in how Nintendo treats fans of their IP, the games they put out themselves are consistently fun. Mario Kart still feels like Mario Kart even decades later, and not in stagnating/bad way.


The original creators of Mario Kart are still involved in the latest entries (a 34-year run!) Thats not common outside Nintendo.


Didn't know, that's pretty cool! I do think Nintendo generally has a good sense of what they want from their games, so perhaps future generations will stay true to the current 'generation' of game leads.


Nintendo seems to be the outlier in the video games industry in that they are very much willing to foster talent over a long term. People who started doing sprite work 35 years ago are still there today and directing games. It's almost like the secret to long-term success is developing a roster of highly-skilled professionals, rather than treating your staff as disposable.


The War on Drugs only serves to give law enforcement unlimited extra constitutional powers.

Even the bizarre murder of Central American fishermen is justified by someone somewhere having a dime bag or something.

Who needs trials , or evidence. Drugs are bad.

Government good.

Drugs bad.


i don't dispute that the "War on Drugs" was (is?) pretty much just a glorified jobs program for law enforcement but nevertheless some drugs are very bad. ironically enough alcohol, despite being the most readily available drug after caffeine, is probably the worst drug of all in terms of societal destruction.


> is probably the worst drug of all in terms of societal destruction.

We are yet to observe a society where the overwhelming majority of the population regularly uses fentanyl, crack cocaine or meth-amphetamine. I bet that if we try comparing apples to oranges alcohol would end up being relatively harmless.


If Crack was legal today would you light up a pipe ?

Maybe right after filing your taxes ?

The most dangerous part of any illegal substance is the illegal economy existing to support it. Drug dealers generally can’t sue each other so they resolve disputes via other means.

Law Enforcement has the right to suspend all your so called rights because someone you may or may not know might have an unauthorized substance.

Set the legal drug age to whatever the enlistment age is. I’d argue 21 for both.


> If Crack was legal today would you light up a pipe ?

I wouldn’t but I don’t drink either, while many ppl drink themselves to incapacitation.

The difference between crack and a bottle o’ Jack though is that consequence of a crack-filled weekend isn’t just a hangover.

Maybe a society with all drugs legal would eventually figure out tolerable dosages for heavy recreational crack use (I really did write this ha), but do you want to live through the couple of decades of that discovery phase?


You mean a society that doesn’t give millions of people criminal records for what’s ultimately a health issue ?

Probation still doesn’t work. You don’t have a whole lot of bootleggers now do you ?

Regulate, tax, educate.


Crack is less harmful than alcohol by pretty mucch every measure so if anything we should be swapping the place of alcohol and crack.


Not fentanyl, but it used to be normal to get methamphetamine as a cough treatment from any pharmacy, and it worked out okay.


Heroine and cocaine too, coke was full of... coke at the beginning


Pretty sure we have a a couple examples of what happens when a huge swath of the people in charge are using prescription amphetamines.

Berlin in 1939 and Silicon Valley jn 2026 come to mind.


And every year inbetween. Cocaine never stopped being popular.


Something else will drop the ball guaranteed.

Can you show me the workflow which uses this and has an iPhone as the bottleneck


Moving my videos from ip to my TB ssd ?


are these videos larger than the iphone SSD or TB SSD DRAM buffer and will need to drop to NAND erase/write speed?


No, but i dont understand your point ?


The point is, with your example the link speed of the iPhone isn't the limiting thing of your example. You'll likely be limited by the speed of your storage before you saturate that link.


Not to mention a whole lot of new vulnerabilities are bound to arise with all this new software.

We really just need better regulations around data retention, especially ppi.

Never going to happen though, no incentives exist to NOT sell my personal data


All you really need are easy to replace batteries. That’s the only part that will wear out within a reasonable lifecycle.

Aside from FairPhone no one offers that


> All you really need are easy to replace batteries. That’s the only part that will wear out within a reasonable lifecycle.

This is far from true. Power connectors.


Screens too


Screens generally break because you dropped the phone and you can take out have the components that way.

But no matter what your battery is at 80 or 70 percent in 2 years.

Power connectors are much harder to engineer to be replaced. Something has to connect at some point


Delete unused apps and set your phone to flight mode when not using it. This does wonders to your battery life. A 5 year old phone can last a week.

Of course this doesn't work if you're expecting to receive calls or notifications.


What’s the point of having a phone then ?

I personally buy mid range phones for around 400$ and then buy new after 2 years.

Better than buying a 1200$ phone and expecting it to last 5 years


In Germany both Shift and Gigaset have had user replaceable batteries for over a decade. The rebrands like Volla and rePhone, obviously. The Finish Jolla has a new phone with battery, camera lenses, etc. Typing on a GS5 with Sailfish. Repair of display was easy to perform.


And the only part that an average user can hope to replace. I tried to replace a cracked sceen once, and ruined the phone. And I consider myself pretty handy, I do all my own car repairs, household plumbing, etc.


Nope, shiftphone's display can be replaced in a minute, without any tools. And it's as waterproof as the iPhone or similar device.


> All you really need are easy to replace batteries.

They are easy _enough_ to replace already. Is it as easy as 20 years ago? Surely not. It also seems reasonable that something you're going to be realistically doing once per 3-4 years would require 1 or 2 hours.

Moreover, the regulation doesn't affect this process, apart from "no proprietary tools".

> That’s the only part that will wear out within a reasonable lifecycle.

Millions of broken screens and back glass/plastic panels beg to differ.


That’s basically what I’m thinking.

Not only is this pointless, it’s outright mis information. Who gains anything from having an llm create an imaginary person ?

I guess for pure entertainment, but this looks like it’s a historical website


The design / UX world has been creating imaginary user personas, paying jobs for people to be the shaman / guru of each persona, for years.

It's all just larping, inserting the bias and assumptions of your team into the spot where knowing your customers should be.


Youtube is full of this, history slop. Some techbro hyperfixated on this and LLMs gives it life before he's bored and moved on to the next thing to hyperfixate on.

It's techbro ejaculate. 10 minutes of euphoria for slop to come out in the end to spread to unsuspecting victims.


Welcome to the future of widespread information, where the uneducated masses don't understand what context, or the definition of words for that matter, even is.


YouTube has had a larger effect imo.

Kids from marginalized and affluent communities alike are now being raised on Mr. Beast. Mr Beast speak may become the universal dialect of the future.

Like and subscribe replaces goodbye. Who am I to judge. Mr Beast is articulate after all.

If you grow up in the hood like myself code switching ends up being a much needed skill.

In the future Mr Beast speak becomes a first language. Maybe dialects are outdated artifacts of the old times.

Like and subscribe.


How is this any different from television? Rich kids didn't get different cartoons growing up.


Different stations carry different shows often from town to town.

Mr Beast is a multinational phenomenon which can be viewed by anyone on earth , practically for free.

Kids from Compton to Brompton are learning the exact same dialect. Plus a lot of them are going to want to be content creators themselves and with a used IPhone they can get started.

Of course you’d copy the best.

The internet allows us to create and share culture faster than ever before.

Honestly this is fantastic, it’s possible to gain exposure to say Korean and even hop on video chat with native speakers even if you’re living in Albania.

I’m a bit old, 30 something, and I struggle with languages. But if I was younger I’d try to be fluent in a minimum of 3


Struggling with languages is often a function of not putting enough hours into learning them, and less a function of age. Of course finding time can get more difficult after you leave school.


I also don’t have any real motivation.

I’d imagine if the CEO of Samsung offered me a 500k TC role on the condition I become fluent in Korean within 18 months I’d put in more effort.


motivation is absolutely huge. There was a survey of language learners iirc and the most common reason for learning a language all the way to fluency was because it was a a significant other's mother tongue.

Heck, thats my motivation for my language learning right now!

I've heard people say that once you get one learned this way, other languages are easier, because you're much more clear eyed about the process (though few truly go beyond 4 or 5 to a high level)


They didn't get different ones, but they may have watched different ones, especially if rich parents/tutor/babysitter controls the TV vs a latchkey child vs a child of a single mother. Not sure I would make any strict claims though, but food for thought.


I know nothing about a purported interwebz phenom called Mr Beast. In case it arises.. is his stuff safe for a 6yo ?


Kids watch AI-dubbed Mr Beast videos


Not really. Mr. Beast (whatever that is) may be big in your bubble. In my bubble that's a literally who, I doubt even 1 child out of 100 knows what that is.

Cross-cultural (acultural?) memes like sixtyseven have much wider appeal.


Mr. Beast is really big. You should actually ask those kids; you may be surprised.


> (whatever that is) may be big in your bubble

Come on. It's fine not to know about something, but Mr Beast has the YouTube channel with the biggest number of subscribers, and has the third most followed TikTok account [1]. It is a worldwide phenomenon. 515 million subscribers, it's far from "your bubble".

Not my cup of tea (and also virtually absent from my bubble), but you should probably have a quick look to know what people are talking about / experiencing in this world.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr_Beast#:~:text=With%20more%2...


Well, for one thing, Mr. Beast is originally an anglophone thing. That alone makes him kinda niche globally.


About 2 billion people speak English. That is a pretty big niche.


Even more billions don't speak it. That's makes it a minority group, and it's not only possible but commonplace that there are areas that don't follow him.


Eh, no. I'm personally fine with disavowing famous people. We've no obligation to act like we know them or care about them.


Nobody asked that of anyone.

It was the made-up bullshit part they took issue with.


I'm in Germany, in the let's say "people with higher education; good white-collar jobs with enough money for most of my friends to buy or build a house and save money for the future" bubble.

Yes, we have heard of MrBeast, most of us would likely recognize his face.

But that's about it. Nobody watches this stuff, most people in this bubble, including me, are shaking their heads at this kind of content. It's seen as low-quality stuff you actively avoid and as something you'd try to keep your kids away from.

So obviously the next logical step is to think that it is a very negative development if THAT is the kind of content that is spreading all over the world, shaping and influencing a new generation.


Isn’t it a given we’re talking about the English speaking world?

I’m sure there are tons of Chinese influencers I’ve never heard of.

Mr Beast is well spoken which as far as I’m concerned makes him a reasonably ok influence.

If I was a parent I’d probably be ok with my kids watching him. We have a talk about advertising, I’d want them to understand he’s basically just a salesman.


> Isn’t it a given we’re talking about the English speaking world?

eee... no? When you talk about "multinational phenomenon" I really thought of something more like Friends sitcom, which is really known everywhere, not just in English speaking world.


The context of the article being in English has to matter here.

I don't know how German works, I wouldn't expect Mr Beast to change how German kids speak.

Not sure about Germany, but I think France has a government organization specifically tasked with keeping French French. Local businesses are encouraged to use French words in naming and advertising.


> Well, obviously we're talking about Default Language people from Default Country and Default Social Strata

No, it's not really a given. :)


>:)

Slightly off-topic, but I call this the Inadvertent Snark Smiley


> Yes, we have heard of MrBeast, most of us would likely recognize his face.

Yeah, so you have actually heard about him them. Your earlier comment was dishonest.

What follows in your comment is your actual argument and I happen to agree.

(FWIW I'm French; but I think his content is translated! - so no, we aren't only talking about the English speaking world to answer 999900000999.)


(sorry, I mixed things up, I thought your were OP. Sorry for this)


The issue is building a browser is not profitable by itself.

You’d need to sell an annual subscription of 150$ to like 10 million people to get a browser that’s actually developed for users and not in some bizarre exploitive fashion.


The current spend on Firefox development is only about $290 million per year, not the $1.5bn you're talking about...

But at the end of the day, it's not the amount of money that matters, it's the goals of the people running it.


If you sell it on Steam or the Mac App Store we’re talking about a minimum of 30% gone off top.

Marketing costs money. Taxes, etc. Not everyone is going to pay the full 150$. Various discount programs would probably exist.

Anyway, even if my numbers are off not enough people will pay for a browser for this to be a viable business.

If you disagree you can start today and I’ll gladly subscribe. Not a fork, no build a new browser from scratch with feature parity to chrome


> Not a fork,

I guess you know you're wrong because why else would you need this bizarre requirement?


Because otherwise you can git clone Firefox , change it's name and call it a new browser.

I guess if we really get technical we could say you can fork, but need to independently implement updates going forward.


> you can fork

Progress!

> but need to independently implement updates going forward.

That's not needed either? But since you've provided no rationale, it's hard to point out where the mistake lies. What's wrong with using known code updates as long as you remove the anti-user parts?


Because you have no control over the future of the project. If Firefox or Chrome starts going down a route where they deprecate features you need you probably won't have the expertise to keep them going.

Anyway modern browsers are too hard to build profitably I guess without anti-consumer weirdness. Might have to switch to a cli RSS reader...


> it's not the amount of money that matters

I think that matters quite a bit. Otherwise, if you've got a spare $1,000, build us a browser. Maybe vibe code it?


Thanks for sharing.

Everyone is speed running towards a future where you need a permit to write software.

Try to run a binary that doesn’t have the right cert( or whatever it’s called on Windows) and you get a bunch of warnings.

Even if Android is open , normal people will only use the App Store. I can imagine China forcing Apple to allow 3rd party installations of software one day .

The EU did something where to my knowledge Apple still gets a cut of each sale.


https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html

This article appeared in the February 1997 issue of Communications of the ACM (Volume 40, Number 2).


I am really hoping Google forces everyone to use signed apps Play Store. That is the only thing that will make people stop using Google/Android, to develop a real, actual, not-just-a-bad-fork-of-Android alternative mobile platform. Otherwise everyone will keep putting up with the bullshit because it's not painful enough yet. The OS will keep getting more bloated and slow. We'll all be forced by the constant churn of breaking changes to keep buying new phones when the old ones work fine. And the surveillance state of an authoritarian country has instant root access on half the devices on the planet.


Not just warnings.

I literally can't run non signed software in the job-provided computer even if I compile it myself.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: