There comes at point at which it is better for everyone to just disclose the details and pursue Full Disclosure. I think we reached that point hours ago.

It has been incredibly frustrating watching Twitter and that (potentially, I don't know how reliable the leaks are) being a better information source than anything else, at least so that those of us hosting stuff ourselves can try and explore if there are any defensive measures that can be put in place in lieu of any actual fixed builds being released.

I suspect this is already being actively exploited now.

https://x.com/J4ck3LSyN/status/2112703096443097263

They've now posted a proof of concept as well.

Seems like some of the people engaging in "responsible disclosure" were not very responsible and it leaked out.

With that info public they do really need to just release the fix, assuming that tweet is accurate.

edit: Mitigation for impacted versions is to set `session.upload_progress.enabled = Off` in php.ini

> edit: Mitigation for impacted versions is to set `session.upload_progress.enabled = Off` in php.ini

I think this is only partial mitigation: https://x.com/Dinosn/status/2112717168349712734

I have additionally followed the advice to just ban multipart uploads before the request even touches PHP (luckily my app doesn't use them at all). I do now know if this conclusively resolves it.

One gotcha for anyone applying this tonight: on a lot of Debian/Ubuntu-style setups the CLI and PHP-FPM read different php.ini files (for example /etc/php/8.x/cli/ vs /etc/php/8.x/fpm/), so "php -i" from a shell can show it Off while the web side still has it On. Check it through a phpinfo() page or the FPM binary itself, and remember to reload php-fpm afterwards. On shared hosting where you can't touch the main ini, it should be settable per directory in .user.ini, but that file is cached for a few minutes by default, so give it time before testing. And as others said, treat it as a stopgap until the actual patch lands.

Tweet allegedly showing exploit at work:

https://x.com/k_firsov/status/2112641845926989944

(video). Yikes

This seems to work without an X account: https://nitter.app/k_firsov/status/2112641845926989944

But not with a vpn

nitter instance: https://twitter.jotalea.com.ar/k_firsov/status/2112641845926...

This video is iconic

Looks like details about the exploits have already leaked on twitter, if the info is correct then it can be mitigated by setting session.upload_progress.enabled = Off until you get the opportunity to update

Not enough apparently

> The PHP 8.6 release manager is on Reddit saying this can’t be fixed with ini settings alone, and needs PHP to be patched

https://x.com/johnplaysdf/status/2112737802379047099?s=46

> INI settings alone won't protect you. You need to patch PHP.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/1xb2utu/comment/phyu5m...

The person who posted the main video that's getting shared confirmed this as well: https://twitter.com/k_firsov/status/2112718728232329240

This was supposed to be embargoed.

So your reliable source can't keep a secret.

Responsible disclosure is broken in 2026. All it takes is a vague implication that a vulnerability exists and there are enough people with enough AI tokens that it will be found quickly.

Yeah, she lied when I asked if it was under responsible disclosure/co-ordinated disclosure -- otherwise I wouldn't have posted it!

Two things you can do now:

1. Turn off session upload progress

2. Block multipart requests at the web server

More info: https://www.vincentschmalbach.com/cve-2026-109618-and-cve-20...

Or:

3. Disable PHP entirely on your server, and live with broken sites until the patch arrives.

That's what I did; I can live with my sites being down until it's possible to patch PHP. Though, there are likely others who cannot. The CERT-EU advisory is basically advising the same thing[1].

[1] https://cert.europa.eu/publications/security-advisories/2026...

I maintain one old site in PHP. This just got way easier to communicate with my users when I can communicate that major government services are also offline.

Our current plan is to refactor this into Rust using a coding agent. It looks feasible to get this done today.

This vulnerability has already been reproduced by a third party with LLM assist. And of course they posted the details on Twitter - and someone else posted the link here just now. So the cat's out of the bag.

That means roughly 70% of all websites (WordPress, Laravel, Drupal, Joomla, Magento) are currently open to remote code execution. About half of that is running an older PHP 5 and 7 that apparently will not receive the urgent security patch.

> Two heap use-after-free primitives in PHP's `session.upload_progress` handler

Guess it's time to rewrite PHP in Rust. Claude, make no mistakes, you can do it!

> Guess it's time to rewrite PHP in Rust.

The Truffle Framework on GraalVM is a better approach to writing interpreters these days, because you get a JIT and lots of language interop for free.

There was a PHP implementation here: https://github.com/abertschi/graalphp

Official statement released by PHP: https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-20-1

Statement by CERT-EU: https://cert.europa.eu/publications/security-advisories/2026... :

>Where immediate patching is not feasible, organisations should consider isolating internet-facing applications from public networks until a fix is available.

It seems serious. Well, good luck isolating all PHP applications from the public internet...

Well great thanks. I need details now. Where, core? Extensions? What config?

My guess is on some request filtering thing

Yes, it's on core. All versions from PHP 5 onwards. Only PHP 8 will be patched.

So a few million WordPress sites are just going to be overnight targets.

Although I guess that's not a dramatic change in the status quo.

It's not. I maintain some WP sites, including one that is so custom that it can't be run on a service like WPEngine. I just assume it will be hacked on a regular basis.

Large swaths of the filesystem are chattr +i'd, non-writeable by the user PHP runs as. I have capabilities and network rules applied so that that context can't communicate outbound on the network. I have a WAF that restricts outbound traffic (normal users never download something as big as even 1 megabyte). I have a set of firewall rules to tarpit any automated scans that come near the site.

Nowadays, I run an AI agent continuously that scans the VM everything is hidden in for any signs of an intrusion, plus the host that contains the VM as well. I make sure that agent is sandboxed as well. (This only costs a few dollars a day in tokens which I bill to the customer.)

After this next world-wide intrusion, I may finally be able to convince the client they need to get off the WordPress e-commerce site that they got a teenage girl to do for free a decade ago.

surely not only 8, that would be insane

Everything before 8.2 is past EOL.

This is serious enough that EOL should not matter. Of course, if someone is still running PHP 7 or even older, they're probably not updating anyway.

Details are due for disclosure at 1400hrs UTC tomorrow. That timeline may yet change.

Those CVEs refer to vulnerabilities in wordpress plugins (not php) and the vulnerabilities are not RCEs.

Am I missing something?

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-9618 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-9619

It sounds like the upcoming ones are 2026-109618/109619, not 9618/9619

I even double checked, I'm so blind.

Hey guys,

I have a long day tomorrow auditing all our php websites and so I wrote a simple CLI tool that finds every place php version is mentioned in a repo eg (Dockerfile tags, compose/k8s images, setup-php in CI, .tool-versions, distro php packages, composer) and flags the end of life branches now.

Floating tags and distro packages can't be labelled deterministically since the tool only reads the files right now so they get labelled "check manually"

I will also update the package as soon as the fixes drop with the updated versioning which will not require anything on the users end (no updates required)

Till then check out npx php2shell-repo-audit . https://github.com/Amsozzer1/php2shell-repo-audit

This is why I abandoned PHP years ago. All of my stuff is static site now. Generated by Pelican.

PHP has an abominable security history. I thought it was actually falling out of fashion. I was shocked today to hear it powers 69% of the web still.

https://github.com/consocio/php2shell-audit/ GLM 5.3 just wrote it to audit all my php sites. I hope it is useful to you

Quick correction to the text above, PHP says the patch/announcement will be available Wednesday, 21 October 2026 at 14:00 UTC.

https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-20-1

Yes it's now Wednesday, but Thursday was originally correct. Because of this HN post, it's been moved up to tomorrow.

Here's the alleged demo video. It's called php2shell https://x.com/k_firsov/status/2112641845926989944 and it's scary as hell.

If you don't do local file include (LFI) esp. from a $_GET or $_POST then to what degree would the site be impacted?

...100%?

well, until the patch drops I'm pretty much vulnerable.

I went and disabled my websites that run on PHP, and I will most likely migrate it to a VPS. maybe even another language like golang.

The full details will be available on 8:00 AM at Mexico City