HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

I think i was pretty clear in my original post.

Its about people doing the seemingly impossible with technology, not technology doing whats possible with technology. If you use AI, you did nothing but ask it, and i could never be impressed by that.

And how would you vote in the competitions at demoparties? By tokens used?

Most parties strictly forbid the use of AI in production, but im afraid some people aren't honest enough to abide to that rule.



why would you have to vote any differently based on which tools are used


Because building something with AI is not as impressive as building something without it.


sure but if everyone is using AI, wouldn't the bar also be raised for everyone? you can output more faster and the bar for impressive is much higher

I suppose it would be interesting to have a random split, half use AI half don't, judging is blind and see what the outcome is


The demoscene is all about showing off technical skill.

Using AI requires next to zero technical skill.

That's the key.

I think the problem is that you think of demoscene as just fancy videos, but it's actually about making a fancy video while dealing with serious constraints. In the classic demoscene of the 80s/90s, that constraint was processing power or RAM. In the modern day, processing power is immense, so people make the constraints artificial, such as putting a limit on your executable size.

Using AI to produce a demo within constraints is simply not impressive.

AI isn't a tool the way a debugger, compiler, or IDE are. It's more like outsourcing your work to someone else, then taking the credit for producing it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: