>Saint Simon of Trent was recognized by Church for centuries

And why is that past tense?

>Even jewish historian Toaff documented cases of infanticide and connection to religious rituals in his book “Pasque di sangue”. Its all corroborated with evidence

From your own link:

>Toaff withdrew the book from circulation a week after its publication and republished it the following year with an afterword stating that there was no relationship between the use of dried blood in Jewish ritual and the alleged ritual murders underlying the blood libel.

>And why is that past tense?

because the Church has issued "nostra aetate", which was written by ashkenazi jews Gregory Baum, John Oesterreicher, Bruno hussar. This was a political decision driven by aftermath of ww2 and coordinated by the World Jewish Congress and had no basis in theological nor facts nor any other legitimate reasons.

>Toaff withdrew

of course, he withdrew because people did not like the original research he published. He literally received death threats by people who did not like the facts, so he decided to withdraw and self-censor out of caution for his own life.

Thank you, I think this explanation underlines my above point better than I could in my own words.

I can’t believe modern people still believe Middle Ages blood libels. Antisemitism truly runs deep in some circles.

its not a blood libel when we saw the genocide and mountains of dead children in FullHD