Maybe. But this article was at the least drafted by claude. It does all the things, including that weird word density + concept vapidity that makes parsing so difficult and annoying.
The biggest problem I see related to that is the marked haziness over what exactly has been accomplished. As best I can tell, this paper claims to have deanonymized primary election ballots that were cast during the early voting period. But it's written as if it was deanonymizing general election ballots cast on election day.
