Is this a conversation you are having with yourself or an LLM response?
> He moves between at least three different meanings without separating them
> he says that before making an argument about US interest rates/debt
> So if I were reducing his recurring argumentative style to the most defensible labels, I’d say:
Not only are you incorrect, your model response is too. I also don’t care about a big dump of alleged fallacies. It’s just meaningless to me. At least have the common courtesy of sanitizing your responses.
