HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

We have organizations chartered for land, air, and sea superiority. It seems fairly reasonable to have an organization chartered for space superiority, instead of leaving that adhoc across the other forces.


Air? I know it's splitting hairs, but there was already a branch with much experience of launching and flying things.


every branch has experience launching and flying things but we still have an air force.


This. All services have experience doing most things - they do those things to maintain superiority over their domain. And the way they do them is specialized to that domain.

The navy was up there to maintain superiority over water. The airforce over the air. The army likewise.

But nobody clearly owned maintaining superiority over the domain of space and any operation that needed to ensure uncontested operation in space was a joint agency nightmare.

Space force is chartered to provide superiority in space so the other services can conduct their operations up there. Space is clearly a specialization that is differentiated from the air.


I've known Navy people to make the case that the Air Force shouldn't be separate from the Navy. I have no idea if they're right, but I'm sure there are websites arguing the pros and cons out there.


The Air Force was part of the army, not the navy. You probably mean the marines (which also has its own fixed wing air force lol)


I always liked this description of Marine aviation: The Navy's Army's Air Force.


The Air Force does launching and flying over land as well as land based missiles. Flying over water is the navy’s business.


Ain't no air in space.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: