Isn't this against their ToS? Useful for hobby stuff.

It would be great if we could correct Jev's incorrect answers, even on a separate endpoint. Let me tell it what Jev got wrong.

What type of head is that? What type of model is that head part of?

Not today, but Interesting idea. The main motivation was a drop-in for an existing Jev setup, so the only teacher right now is Jev and the audit measures agreement with Jev. A correction would have to become a second label source that overrides Jev's for that input.

The head is a multinomial logistic regression: one linear layer plus softmax on top of a frozen sentence-embedding model (bge-small by default, swappable). That head is the entire local model, the encoder is off the shelf and never changes.

Yeah, I kinda figured that head was the whole model, the way you phrased it. scikit-learn?

No, plain numpy. It's full-batch Adam on cross-entropy against soft targets, about 80 lines.

I'll look into Adam, thank you!

Woah cool idea. So it's almost a drop-in replacement for a typical Jev setup that just reduces your jev bill over time ?

Thanks.

Drop-in yes: point TYPESAFE_BASE_URL at it and nothing else changes.

Please don’t post AI generated replies.

Why do you think that's AI?