But that has nothing to do with the supply chain risk designation, it's just a DoD requirements mismatch.

My response was re the not functioning as contracted issue, not the supply chain risk. Having said which, I can well imagine possible cause and effect here.

That means that the software was not tested for every scenario. Not that the user cannot try to use it in a way it was never intended to.

If, on the other hand, Anthropic deliberately blocks the user from doing something, then it is sabotage.

> That means that the software was not tested for every scenario.

Actually I think it means what it says.

> Not that the user cannot try to use it in a way it was never intended to

No-one said it did. User can try anything he likes. That's beside the point.

> If, on the other hand, Anthropic deliberately blocks the user from doing something, then it is sabotage.

Well, consider CSAM generation. Anthropic is free to block whatever it likes.