HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

Most of them are using AI for all their schoolwork while performatively hating it because "it wastes water" or some other half-understood meme.
help



no? it's because nobody likes AI slop

Everyone likes slop. That's why Instagram, Tiktok and Linkedin were so popular pre-AI.

They don't like slop when they're looking for non-slop and they recognise the slop, because it's not solving their problem. If they don't recognise the slop they'll just treat it as non-slop and use it, and in this case they arguably still liked it.


As as AI gets better it'll be harder to detect slop thus people won't think it's slop.

I'm a fan of generated music and have run across some generated vids I like. I've seen some really creative stuff which took existing fiction and generated vid content around that. Previously, that content simply would not have been created because it would have been way too expensive. I know I'm not the only one out there who enjoys it at times.

There is undoubtedly some performative element, how big that is who knows?


Confessing to liking generated music is wild and legitimately embarrassing. Somehow, even compared to ripoff visual art, fake music is even more obviously plagiaristic. The stuff that it's ripping off already exists and isn't even hard to find since ALL of it is billed exactly as the style/genre that it's stealing from. That's the equivalent of framing and hanging a "ghibli style" generated print in your living room.

This is what I mean, people don't feel the same way. I find the lyrics creative enough, the style hits, that's all I'm looking for. I don't find most music on the market that interesting, anyway. I found people making music about UFOs and disclosure of all things, there isn't exactly a huge market for that. It's allowing people to express things in music they previously weren't.

This is the kind of stuff which will just cause people to be contrarian and like it because we're told it's something to be embarrassed over. People put human-created content on way too high of a pedestal.

I find it interesting that we have tools which can take a general concept and sound and create hours and hours of content out of that and I don't consider it any different than remixing human stuff, it is still human at its core.

Honestly, for the people who hate this stuff, the best thing you can do is not to mock people in this way because I promise you, that's how you get contrarians. Do you know how rude it is to be told that what you like is legitimately embarrassing? What caused you to say that to another human being? Come on!


Well they used to. Make music about UFOs and such, I mean.

Woke up this morning, I was feeling quite weird, Had flies in my beard, my toothpaste was smeared Over my window, they'd written my name, Said so long, we'll see you again ...

Did a vehicle, did a vehicle, did a vehicle come from somewhere out there, just to land in the Andes? Was it round and did it have a motor ...

Music was more interesting once.


>Make music about UFOs and such, I mean.

Fleetwood Mac, 1975, "hypnotized" comes to mind. As does "Interstellar Overdrive" by Pink Floyd

So yeah. They did.


sure, sure, and Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft by the Carpenters in '77.

But what was the name of the song quoted in the comment you responded to?

Wasn't that also a song about UFOs and such and didn't that comment explicitly already acknowledge such songs existed?


Some people eat at Chipotle every day

Error: unpopular opinion detected

If nobody likes it then why do they all make and use it? Revealed preferences.

Do you like carbon monoxide? No? Then why do you make and "use" it?

Maybe breathe and let your brain have some oxygen to think about the answer to your own question.

Wearing your second job uniform while working doesn't reveal a preference for blue jackets, it just means you'd like to not be fired.


Not sure why you felt the need to throw in a random insult there but I'm sure you already know the answer to the difference between making something voluntarily and involuntarily.

Apologies, I intended the oxygen bit as a flippant joke but I can see how that could come across as an insult instead.

As to the difference between voluntary and involuntary, the grey line between those is exactly my point. The employee 'voluntarily' wears blue jackets and could certainly not wear one, and risk getting fired, and certainly could quit that job. A student certainly could spend far more time than their peers on study and end up with a lesser grade on their work, with presumably less returns in most cases. I see a lot of parallels between a teenage student navigating complex new social relationships and learning their way through middle and high school and an employee trying to just earn enough money for rent, in terms of both of them having to make 'choices' that do not feel from the inside like decisions they make freely and that have consequences that appear life-ruining to not take (in which case it reveals a preference for not having your life ruined, rather than for whatever it is that you decided to wear or use or do to merely keep up with the perceived requirements).


there's no way you actually didn't understand what I meant right?

using LLMs to learn for example is not the same as enjoying AI slop posters/art etc


I'm talking about the latter. Lots of people make slop art and use AI slop for their school essays as mentioned above. Just a few days ago we had this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49764791

I'm not one bit surprised that you'd use the path of least resistance to do some essay that you could care less about.

hating AI slop overall like seeing it in shirts or something like that is not performative.


That's the part that's performative, they use it, and maybe even like using it, but then outwardly say how much they hate it. I feel like you're not getting that point about what others here are saying.

because nobody says "I hate x y and z uses of AI", especially the youth.

like with that logic, everybody loves AI and all the uses of it because they're not being specific enough in their speech


They like some uses of it, but say they hate all of it, that is the performative part.

I don't think anyone hates all of AI except a minority

and even if you would hate AI, you don't really have a choice anymore since employers will expect you to be more productive due to it

but I definitely see a bunch of hate towards the dystopian aspects of it and as mentioned before, the whole slop thing and how you see AI slop everywhere now. it definitely evokes a very negative feeling in me when I see something like that


That's our point. No one hates all of it yet some people such as some of the Gen Alpha kids as shown in the article performatively act as if they do. Sounds like you're agreeing with us here in this thread.

That doesn't refute what GP is saying at all.

If it makes you feel better, it can be rephrased as:

> Most of them are using AI for all their schoolwork while performatively hating it because "nobody likes AI slop" or some other half-understood meme


that's not "performative" though?

and how is it "half-understood"? it's simply not the same thing


People actually do like AI slop. I run into older people all the time that think its beautiful and/or fun.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: