"So, teleoperation is probably very economically productive. Is it a good thing? I think mostly no, for several reasons." followed by several paragraphs discussing the negative consequences. This is celebrating?

"Mostly" no. You can read a lot of warnings from rationalists that are oddly about the things they are actively working on.

I think the order of concerns is also telling.

Primary reason why it's bad: Increase risk of runaway superintellicence, XRisk, etc etc

Secondary reason: Oh, it will also make most people unable to have a living wage. We should probably do something about that, if it doesn't strain the economy too much.

The dehumanization of everyone who will still have a job? Nah, not a problem.

Though I think this dismisses the potential of people to organize, especially in jobs like those. This is why I'm skeptical that future will happen as easily as he is warning here.

[author]

Human extinction, mass starvation, and terrible jobs are all outcomes I think we should try hard to avoid. But I do think I have them in the right order!

(The post is also not about something I'm working on.)

AI;DR

I don't see any celebrating in the article. The article makes it pretty clear that the author sees many problems coming from teleoperated humans.

Try reading the article before commenting