HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

> It is designed to entrap people who don't really think about their tech. […] So rather than transfer to some external storage, as they might not even have a working mental concept of a file system let alone a personal computer that isn't work issued anymore for that matter, they started having to buy bigger and bigger storage capacity iphones.

It is not "entrapping", it's providing a service.

My senior-aged mom does have the skill, nor the desire, to figure out local image storage/backup, and I have no interest in running self-hosted solution (even for myself). Apple providing iCloud for backups is not "entrapping" her.



> It is not "entrapping", it's providing a service.

The complaint here is about the tier pricing model, not the service


> The complaint here is about the tier pricing model, not the service

If you use more storage why shouldn't you pay more? A 1000 sq. ft. (100 sq.m.) apartment costs more than 500. Is there a cloud storage provider that does not charge per usage? E.g.,

* https://www.dropbox.com/plans

There are certainly service for more technically minded folks that calculate more granularly:

* https://www.tarsnap.com

* https://www.rsync.net/pricing.html

But a 'normie' may not appreciate a 'dynamic pricing' model, and may understand a fixed price system better.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: