HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

Because the author's proud ignorance sheds some light on the article's authenticity and validity of claims (or the complete lack thereof).
help



Proud ignorance? With such many references to support his point it looks pretty informed to me.

Did you chase those references? A core premise and complaint is entirely false.

This is an article and author that is tailored for AI curmudgeons or an AI rejectionist to self-assure themselves that their worldview is the only correct one. Facts seem to be a nuisance at best here for the author, and helpful phrases like "garbage", "vile", "human toll", "psychopaths" undermine all chances or credibility for a reasonable take or conversation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: