I think it’s particularly infuriating when you sit down, and decide to read something off the reputation of an author (or their institution), only to find out that their writing has a complete disregard for your attention and time…

I did spot two errors in the text:

> With agents, research per projects have become easy and quick.

Either my English is failing me or that is a weird sentence.

And then there is 'wee' in

> If you ask me what a small lab can do today, wee will show you three things:

Which I'm more confident is an error.

My problem was more that it seemed to start with one thesis, and then throughout the article took long detours to market other achievements and then managed to not say very much at the end...

It is common now to insert typos or spelling mistakes to “prove” it is not LLM written

If that's the case here it would be a really low low.