On the promise of potential cost savings by means of firing and/or not hiring as much.

Help me understand your consternation.

What is a possible use case for a legal reasoning tool that is wrong 46% of the time?

It’s barely any better than a coin flip

waiting for the actual Prodigy Corp. to show up and offer to buy your username out?

54.0% isn't particularly high.

What I'm trying to say which doesnt seem obvious is that all models are x% correct at benchmarks until they get saturated, and then new benchmarks get made.