HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

We could always start with “murder is wrong” and “don’t hack into a rival company” and work our way up from there.

Somehow I think if these companies were held financially responsible for what their AI did, we would get alignment real fast.

Edit: ooh CSAM=bad. Don’t launch nuclear weapons. I could go all day.

help



Hmm what about the murder of a tyrant? If so, who gets to define who a tyrant is?

Everything is ideological.


I think it’s safe to err on the side of AI not assassinating people whoever they are. A person can decide.

We’re not trying to accurately define all of the nuances of society, just what we let AI do. We can round down




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: