HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

I would love a Fairphone, but no headphone jack is a nonstarter for me. Still blows me away that a company saying they are focused on longevity would get rid of a universal audio interface that we've had for decades. In the article they claim it's to fit other features in, but frankly that's not a believable claim. Other manufacturers manage to get a headphone jack in just fine, without any noticeable downside.


The headphone jack is inside USB-C connector. You can use USB-C-to-3.5mm passive (!) cable to connect your 3.5mm headphones, or you can buy 3.5mm headphones with USB-C audio connection.

There's no additional DAC involved, the analog audio is already on a USB-C pins.


I can't find anything about that in the article or the Fairphone 6 manual. Do you have a source for this?

My main problem with USB-C headphones on my Android phone is how unreliable they are. But if the USB-C port can just pass through an analog audio connection, that should work much better, I expect.

Edit: This feature is apparently deprecated (removed?) in newer versions of the USB spec! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB-C#Analog_Audio_Adapter_Acc...


How do you charge your phone while listening to music?



Going from separate ports to one port, when its easy to yank the headphone cord and ruin the usb-c so now you can't charge your phone is great.

I've tried those dongles and they are all a huge hassle compared to just having a headphone jack built in.


Well yes, I agree, but the option is there.


I think I'd rather stick with a phone that has a separate headpones port.



How is that better than having a dedicated headphones port?


I didn't claim it is better


Fair enough.


This is always the question, but who does that?


Me.


I absolutely concour about the need of a headphone jack - I do not buy anything without it. So,

> to fit other features in

what exactly, one would ask. If there are tradeoffs, if would be nice if the customers can decide what to have, in a modular product.


At this point headphones with an usb-c connection have become nearly as common as 3.5mm trs ones. Additionally you can permamently hook a small usb-c dac with 3.5mm trs output to the headphones of your choice.

Only issue is some very cheap ones are actually bluetooth headphones in disguise where the usb-c connection only exist to power the bt recepter inside the headphone. I find this completely stupid.


I tried the "jack to USB-C" in the only product I was forced to that needed it: an unthinkable battery drain.


> If there are tradeoffs, if would be nice if the customers can decide what to have, in a modular product.

A "modular product" has tradeoffs in and of itself (such as size, price, water resistance, …), which presumably would not fly for a majority of customers.


Yes, the water resistance is what keeps my phone from dying if I go for a hike in the rain or a small splashy boat ride, replacing the water damaged motherboard isn't as sustainable as buying a used flagship phone from an earlier time.


Given how severely that hard requirement restricts your available options, I'd suggest adapting to the USB-C audio world. No, it's not as nice as a headphone jack. But it is a relatively small con to just stick an adapter onto the ends of your 3.5mm devices and replace it a few times a year when it breaks. And yes, you can get a "charge and listen at the same time" adapter.


Serial is a universal data interface that we've had for decades. Don't need RS232 on my phone though.


Boy it would be nice however.

On that note, I remember reading how some phones were able to use the headphone jack as a serial debug port, which is pretty neat.

https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Serial_debugging/Cable_sc...


The Apple 30-pin connector on the iPod and early iPhones had serial!

That is how your car radio could display the name of the current track.

https://theapplewiki.com/wiki/30-pin_Connector




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: