> Raw figures

sure, for an upper bound.

how many of those 340M people are actually employable? how many are children? how many are retired? permanently unable to work?

subtract those out, it’s a better upper bound but still a swag

then add in all the self-employed, your swag is a little better, still a swag

your throwaway name is apt and funny

That’s the point of raw figures.

You are asking for not raw figures.

But if you do the math and subtract out another 75-100M it’s still very bad

Only if you count my eight year old as “unemployed.”