No, there was a valid point there. "Fractional ownership" and "not property" don't seem to fit together - unless your claim is that only land counts as "property".
You didn't explain at all how that works. To a post pointing out your contradiction, you said "ignorant word salad". That's not an answer; that's an evasion.
So at the moment, to this bystander, you're losing the discussion, because you're the one evading the other guy's point. Would you care to actually answer it? Or should we conclude that you have no actual answer, but still won't admit you're wrong?
Man, alts are out of control eh? Getting pretty obvious eh!
Feel free to do some legal analysis, and figure out what definitions of ‘property’ have evolved out over time so we can argue why ‘real property’ is called what it is.
For all your attempting to sound sophisticated and wise, you're dead wrong. I am not an alt for the other guy, nor he for me. Whatever heuristic you're using that you think detects alts, that heuristic is broken, and resulted in you being loudly, confidently, and publicly wrong. So maybe next time you should be a bit more cautious with your accusation.
You didn't explain at all how that works. To a post pointing out your contradiction, you said "ignorant word salad". That's not an answer; that's an evasion.
So at the moment, to this bystander, you're losing the discussion, because you're the one evading the other guy's point. Would you care to actually answer it? Or should we conclude that you have no actual answer, but still won't admit you're wrong?