HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

it's brave to look at other companies receiving cease and desist notices and treat it as a market opening


twitterwebviewer.com was registered in Hong Kong

according to https://www.whois.com/whois/twitterwebviewer.com

Looks fine, they don't care about the notices i guess


.com domain zone is managed by Verysign US company. They will just C&D them.


It's a step up. Texas took down a Dutch porn site that way, but it was a Texas court order, not a random company sending C&D.


"Check our Wikipedia page for our latest domain. Next stop the Central African Republic!"


C&D has zero legal weight. They're just relying on developers being conflict-averse. At my local hacker space, at least five members are in some kinds of protracted legal battles (five different ones)



I guess my brain has been cooked by internet libertarianism but what's the basis of a C&D for proxying a website?

Is the legal basis just copyright of the contents?


Bigger "guns" diplomacy. They don't need any legal basis for a C&D. Just depends on whether you have enough money to fight it in court.


i dont know the legal basis used, or the validity. i just know that i wouldnt want to have to spend the time or money fighting twitter over it


You don't have to fight a C&D, you can ignore it. But they may sue you and you have to fight that. But they can also sue you without a C&D or even after you comply with one. The C&D itself has no effect, but it's the equivalent of a gangster pointing at his own eyeballs and then yours, "I'm watching you."


you've replied here several times, i understand your position on C&Ds.

a C&D is reasonably understood as an intent to sue if you continue whatever they want you to cease.

my comment can be read as "i just know that i wouldnt want to have to spend the time or money fighting twitter over it (where "it" = ignoring their C&D and being sued)"


Well yeah the copyright violation is pretty clear cut here.


My understanding is that copyright of what's posted is retained by the poster. The Nitter C&D was around a ToS violation for scraping.


Violating ToS is legal, but so is sending a C&D for anything you like




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: