HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

I don't take this concern seriously.

You can be paid/coerced to vote for someone even if there's total secrecy. For example, you can take your cellphone in and take a picture of your filled out ballot to collect a payment.

Unless you want to start the confiscation of cellphones before voting in person, the risk of a coerced or bought vote will always exist.



In Argentina at least, you can get a fine[1] for taking a picture of your ballot. Certainly a hard law to enforce though.

[1]https://www.perfil.com/noticias/politica/elecciones-2025-de-...


> For example, you can take your cellphone in and take a picture of your filled out ballot to collect a payment.

And then you can go up to the election workers and tell them you have a spoiled ballot and want a new one, which they have to give you. That's one reason such schemes don't work right now.

Source: I volunteer as an election worker every year in Iowa.


In Texas, the election judges are supposed to stop you if you pull out a cellphone or any device. Paper is all you are allowed to use during the voting process.


In-person, high-risk rule-breaking that's hard to validate has a tendency to scale differently from say, pasting a value into a lottery/payment app.

I mean, compare the number of people who've flown over Barbara Streisand's property to take a picture of her house to the number of people who had a copy of said picture in their browser cache.

You can read more about this peculiar scaling factor of the internet in Bill Gates 1995 book The Road Ahead.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: