HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

> I, as the human, still have to do the thinking as Claude still 'can't jump'

I still have to do quite a bit of thinking but the amount of of thinking I do per task is trending down. I agree LLMs are not good at abduction but very few humans are either and very few jobs/tasks require it. I can't talk for researchers jobs though. But perhaps fewer researchers would be desired by these labs (not none).



> I still have to do quite a bit of thinking but the amount of of thinking I do per task is trending down

Don't worry, I'm sure you'll hit your goal of zero thinking soon!


Trending towards the Homo Amens Mechanicus: the mechanical thoughtless human. What a goal


Only bc of this I will keep balancing what I do with my brain with what machines can do. dangerous outcome.

The IQ willl drop if we just become mechanical acritical people the same way muscles get worse if you do not exercise.


Cognitive offloading is delegating to the AI and still owning the answer. Cognitive surrender is when the AI’s output quietly becomes your output and there is nothing you feel is left to check. For software engineers the line between the two moves under your feet most days, and most of us are crossing it without noticing.

Source: https://addyosmani.com/blog/cognitive-surrender/


> I agree LLMs are not good at abduction but very few humans are either

I, too, am glad that few humans seem good at abduction.


And I hope LLMs don't get better at it.


"Abduction" being the way the article used it as in "explanatory reasoning in justifying hypotheses". https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: