HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

It's not about crypto, its about process. Compare this action to one by Debian or Wikipedia where there's a formal proposal, time for written pros and cons with convincing arguments for each side, and a meeting where the vote is held and impact to stakeholders is discussed.

You can't make large changes like this without undermining your viability as stable infrastructure.



Too many scammers in crypto. It's a good decision. Cryptos and scammers can host their own.


What "process"?

It's a simple rule: "no cryptocurrency projects".


Obviously the 'process' is how you arrive at the rule.

If it was just one guy who arbitrarily decided as such, that's not much of a 'process' and is exactly what GP was calling out.


No. The process was handled as usual: a proposal was made, and people voted. Overwhelmingly to ban crypto.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: