HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submitlogin

When it comes to Itanium all I can think of is how I wish I could have an Alpha. And how no one should care about Itanium.

It’s the product of companies bent on doing all the wrong things.



It took longer than necessary, but in what ways do you think an Intel Core-derived chip is different from what an “Intel Alpha” would have been?

Taking for granted that hardware backcompat (Itanium had this, too!) was a starting requirement…


Wasn't there a problem with Alpha, that it had too weak memory model or something? Think of atomic instructions with multi CPU system. Or do I remember something wrong?


Alpha was great but that wasn't enough against the convenience of just running an x86 box. It didn't find a niche quickly enough. ARM survived because they were low power. POWER survived because IBM is one big niche. MIPS died and reincarnated into RISC-V. I have no idea where Alpha would have gone had it not been dropped.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: