I understand but these developers did knowingly did it? They even admitted to developing them with these goals in mind. These software agents are not autonomous and do not have agency, you can't let software recklessly hack into things; but I will admit I'm not a lawyer, I don't understand how they aren't liable.

Thanks for the other suggestion, I'll read into their insights more.

Guess it mostly comes down to action, people want to see their electeds actually trying not sitting around with their hands in their pockets while these tools continue to destroy unabated.