A fair response in general, but it's not as if I advocate it, or run a company doing it. I'm simply stating fact.

And I will point out that "stop doing that" can be applied in both directions, towards AI and towards material supply.

And that this is one way, not even remotely the only way, that gene editing at home is easy.

Again, these are just facts.

Some questions...

Is it fair to restrict AI, or fair to restrict 1000 industries?

And if it is fair to restrict 1000 industries, OK, but there should be time to do so, probably? A transition period?

And if you do restrict, many such industries just make needed chemicals, which are used by endless other, non-threatening industries.

What of them?